Click this link to optimize Open City Hall for screen readers Skip to Content
Open City Hall
Open Town Hall

What do you think of a proposed plan to manage on-street parking in higher demand areas?

290 Registered Responses

20
<20

20

20 responses
Tap to select
<20
336
20-29

336

336 responses
Tap to select
20-29
16
30-39

16

16 responses
Tap to select
30-39
14
40-49

14

14 responses
Tap to select
40-49
10
50-59

10

10 responses
Tap to select
50-59
7
60-69

7

7 responses
Tap to select
60-69
5
70-79

5

5 responses
Tap to select
70-79
1
>79

1

1 response
Tap to select
>79
290
Age not shared

290

290 responses
Tap to unselect
Age not shared
Show all statements

290 registered responses from users with age group not specified


Do you live in Provo?

Response Percent Response Count
Yes 92.4% 268
No 7.6% 22

If you don’t live in Provo, what activities bring you to Provo? (check all that apply)

Response Percent Response Count
Work/business 48.8% 39
School 87.5% 70
Shopping/dining/events 41.3% 33
Other 15.0% 12

In your experience, are there issues with crowded parking in Provo?

Crowded parking
Response Percent Response Count
no problem 3.1% 9
in a few areas 34.1% 99
in many areas 41.4% 120
everywhere 21.4% 62

How much should cost recovery or subsidization be part of more parking enforcement?

Cost of parking enforcement
Response Percent Response Count
0% subsidized, 100% cost recovery 9.7% 28
25% subsidized, 75% cost recovery 7.2% 21
50% subsidized, 50% cost recovery 15.9% 46
75% subsidized, 25% cost recovery 12.8% 37
100% subsidized, 0% cost recovery 54.5% 158

Rate your support of the concept of paid parking as a mitigation tool against crowded on-street parking?

Support
Response Percent Response Count
Don't support at all 82.8% 240
- 9.7% 28
Might support 4.5% 13
+ 0.7% 2
Really support 2.4% 7

How important are these factors in a parking management program?

More enforcement
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 55.9% 162
Somewhat important 29.3% 85
Important 9.7% 28
Very important 3.4% 10
Not sure 1.7% 5
Clear signage
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 4.5% 13
Somewhat important 4.1% 12
Important 23.8% 69
Very important 66.9% 194
Not sure 0.7% 2
Ease of payment for parking
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 21.4% 62
Somewhat important 12.4% 36
Important 22.4% 65
Very important 36.2% 105
Not sure 7.6% 22
Permits for property owners
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 17.9% 52
Somewhat important 15.2% 44
Important 25.5% 74
Very important 35.2% 102
Not sure 6.2% 18
Time limits
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 50.0% 145
Somewhat important 31.0% 90
Important 11.7% 34
Very important 4.5% 13
Not sure 2.8% 8
Cost recovery
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 55.5% 161
Somewhat important 22.8% 66
Important 8.3% 24
Very important 5.2% 15
Not sure 8.3% 24
Parking fees
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 65.5% 190
Somewhat important 18.6% 54
Important 9.3% 27
Very important 4.8% 14
Not sure 1.7% 5
Resident input
Response Percent Response Count
Not important 6.6% 19
Somewhat important 6.2% 18
Important 12.1% 35
Very important 70.0% 203
Not sure 5.2% 15

Do you have any other comments about this proposal?

Answered
243
Skipped
47

Your answers will NOT be saved

This is the form that was used to collect responses. It's here so you can try it and see how it worked when the topic was open.

The topic is now closed, and anything you enter into this form will not be saved.

Sign in and be yourself

Sign in and let others know who you are and what you think. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >

Sign in and be someone

Sign in and let others know what you think. Only OpenGov will know who you are. You can sign in now or after you submit your response. You'll be able to read your response on this website and change it if you change your mind.

Read more about privacy >
* required

Be anonymous

We recommend against this option. Even though your response will be shared with staff, it won’t be shown on this public website so other community members won’t have the opportunity to see it.

Concerned about sharing your contact information with OpenGov?

Read more about privacy >

Read more about privacy >

Open City Hall has two participation channels:

  • The Registered Channel: Sign in before or just after you submit your response. Either way, Open Town Hall will show your response on this website.
  • The Unregistered Channel: Don't sign in and remain anonymous. Open Town Hall will just share your response with Provo City Council staff.

Note: The first time you sign in, you'll need to register (establish an account on Open City Hall). Registration is free.

The Provo City Council has contracted with Open Town Hall to monitor responses shown on this website.

  • To prevent any single user from dominating the forum, the Provo City Council restricts the number of responses any one user can post on selected topics. Registration helps Open Town Hall enforce this restriction.
  • Users, staff and government leaders often want to know the neighborhood from which a response is posted. Open Town Hall uses registration to show the neighborhood next to each response (not the address).
  • If a user posts a response that does not meet the Provo City Council guidelines for civility, Open Town Hall uses the user's email address to invite the user to resolve the issue.

Open Town Hall will get your contact information. The company is under contract with the Provo City Council to hold it in strict confidence per their privacy policy.

  • Since you'll see your own response on Open City Hall, you'll be able to confirm that your response was posted as you intended.
  • You'll be able to change and/or delete your response as long as the topic is open.

Yes. Sign out, then set your privacy preference to be "No - just show it without my name to staff". You won't need to register.

While no authentication procedure can perfectly detect every fraudulent registration, Open Town Hall is able to secure the registered channel against systematic fraud: cases where users submit enough statements with fraudulent registrations to sway the overall interpretation of the feedback.

Open Town Hall is unable to secure the unregistered channel against systematic fraud, because unregistered users are anonymous.

Neither the registered nor the unregistered channel represent a certified voting system or ballot box - and that caveat is footnoted on every page of feedback. Instead, both are additional channels for feedback to government.

Users can participate on the registered channel (by signing in) or on the unregistered channel (by remaining anonymous). The Provo City Council offers both channels in order to broaden participation and maximize decision makers' insights.

The registered channel enables users to assure decision makers that their feedback comes from a real person in a specific neighborhood. It also enables users to participate in a public discussion on the website, as well as manage their own response after posting it.

The unregistered channel is for users who want to provide quick feedback without registering, and/or whose privacy concerns would prevent them from participating if required to register. Because many users with valuable insights will only share them anonymously, this channel gives decision makers the option to consider those insights in their deliberations.

OpenGov is a non-partisan company whose mission is to broaden civic engagement and build public trust in government. The Provo City Council has contracted with OpenGov to administer Open City Hall.

* required
no problem
in a few areas
in many areas
everywhere
Crowded parking
* required

For the next question, it is helpful to understand some of the terms we are using.

  • Cost recovery refers to recovering the costs of the expense of additional enforcement by charging a fee to those who use the parking in the OSPM area.
  • Subsidization refers to having covering some of the expense from other revenue sources collected by the City (which has an impact on other services provided by the city).

0% subsidized, 100% cost recovery
25% subsidized, 75% cost recovery
50% subsidized, 50% cost recovery
75% subsidized, 25% cost recovery
100% subsidized, 0% cost recovery
Cost of parking enforcement
* required
Don't support at all
-
Might support
+
Really support
Support
* required
Not important
Somewhat important
Important
Very important
Not sure
More enforcement
Clear signage
Ease of payment for parking
Permits for property owners
Time limits
Cost recovery
Parking fees
Resident input
* required
Check out our guidelines for civility

Fields marked with * are required

Back to Intro