Click this link to optimize Flagstaff Community Forum for screen readers Skip to Content
Flagstaff Community Forum
Opengov

Subscribe to Registered Statements From Forum Participants

Info Hide

Get registered statements in your RSS reader or emailed to you as a daily digest.

A statement is registered if it is claimed, verified and civil:

  1. It is claimed if its author has claimed the statement by signing in before or shortly after submitting the statement.
  2. It is verified if it is claimed and its author has provided their street address in their registration and verified their email address by clicking the verification link emailed by Community Feedback.
  3. It is civil if it is verified and it meets the guidelines for civility.

If any of these conditions are not met, then the statement is unregistered.

(You may be asked to solve a simple puzzle that is easy for humans but difficult for computers)

Statements are emailed at most once per day (in the morning).

Subscribe

Manage your subscription in your RSS feed reader

Check out some recent Registered Statements from forum participants

Name not available inside City Limits January 18, 2023, 3:11 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): Other - own prop comercial edge
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? Neutral/Unsure
What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja? Covered Entry or Porch, Shed Rooflines, Change In Roof Profile (Modulation), Upper Floor Definition (Articulation), Window Trim or Recess, Prohibit New Parking in the Front of Homes

Name not shown inside City Limits January 14, 2023, 1:26 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? Flagstaff is losing its distinctiveness with all the high-rise new housing going up.
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? Because current residents already maintain the character we'd like to preserve. Current residents should not be burdened with additional costs for living in the neighborhood.
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included? It is much easier to look at.
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included? Much more interesting roof line.
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? The variety is nice and less regulation, when practical, is a good thing.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included? Again, too much regulation is not a good idea. It will inhibit growth and development.
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? It definitely adds character to the building.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Yes - good idea
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included? AS a practical matter, cars parking on the street are more vulnerable and restrict traffic flow.
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? It looks more organized to have consistency.
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on homes? It would be more cost effective.
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? Yes - good idea
What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja? Prohibit New Parking in the Front of Homes, Building Face (Facade) Variation (Articulation), Change In Roof Profile (Modulation), Roof Orientation, Building Face (Facade) Window Consistency, Upper Floor Definition (Articulation), Covered Entry or Porch, Shed Rooflines, Window Trim or Recess
In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element) As long as these standards are applied only to new construction, I am okay with all of the above.
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association? While I appreciate making the neighborhood aesthetically pleasing, I am concerned about over-regulation or of additional costs to current residents who are already struggling to afford housing in Flagstaff. Excessive regulation will further drive up costs for new housing as well, which is a great cause for concern.

Name not shown inside City Limits January 14, 2023, 8:20 AM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? I support the organic development of neighborhood character by the neighborhood. I question the imposition of "neighborhood character" by the City of Flagstaff.
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? Affordability and freedom of expression would be a justification for the exemption.
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included? Prohibiting large box like structures will improve the neighborhood. I oppose dictating color or materials that are temporary and can be changed at will.
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included? unwarrented expense.
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included? Not on single family home.
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? City staff should not be dictating anything that can easily be changed without a permit as it is a useless effort and waste of city staff resources.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? No - bad idea
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included? Until the City addresses parking in non parking spaces throughout the city this should not be a requirement.
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? Consistency is normally a matter of economics and does not need regulatory requirements.
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. No - bad idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures? If it meets building code requirements, then it is fine. No further regulation is needed.
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on homes? Building code is adequate regulatory control.
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Yes - good idea
Why do you think any shed roof standards should or should include a requirement for contrasting roof planes? Building code is adequate regulatory control.
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? No - bad idea
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? An inappropriate regulatory expense for a small, constrained parcel.
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association? Carefully consider how much the city government should interfere with the lives of those living in the neighborhood.

Name not available inside City Limits January 13, 2023, 2:59 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? No - bad idea
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Yes - good idea
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? Neutral/Unsure

Name not available inside City Limits January 12, 2023, 10:30 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): Other - Own property close to neighborhood and love the area.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? Flagstaff is already ugly enough, design standards need to raised and considered to keep improve our cities aesthetics.
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? Only existing one story homes should be exempt, new construction should be required.
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included? Building face variation requires great consideration of design which hopefully leads to higher quality construction and better visual design.
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included? Yes, breaks up the facade and creates less blocky structures
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included? Builders are capable of very bad roof modulations. Requiring it doesn't mean it will look good.
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? Unregulated materials will allow builders to default to the cheapest materials. Allow everything except lapsiding, require no common materials on adjacent properties.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included? Recesses should also require decent eave extension to prevent water damage.
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? Hell yeah. Who doesn't want shade or water protection.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? This will require builders to alter floorplans for a silly design aesthetic.
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on homes? Well designed homes can also have single plane roofs.
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? No - bad idea
Why do you think any shed roof standards should or should include a requirement for contrasting roof planes? The idea of variation in design doesn't always equate to good design.
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? No - bad idea
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? Roof orientations should have many considerations ie: sun, water, snow. Form should follow function.
What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja? Covered Entry or Porch, Upper Floor Definition (Articulation), Window Trim or Recess
In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element) Roof orientation should not be regulated.
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association? What I like most of La Plaza Vieja is the variation in design and architecture. Too much prescriptive regulation will only be more restrictive in what can be built. This will lead to too many projects being redundant in design. If better design and preservation is desired, mandate builders to hire architects to assist in planning and design.

Name not shown outside City Limits January 12, 2023, 6:55 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? Flagstaff is loosing its character, style and historical character. Limitations on basic elements, external to the home allow us to retain those characteristics that we value .
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? Homes that already exist is one thing, development of new multi family structures is in a different category. Flag has enough multi story "student" housing.
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included? It provides a vehicle to meld new construction with existing structures
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included? Not a big deal
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included? Again, this gives designers the opportunity to mimic existing buildings
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? I would rather see similar buildings of various material than large, soulless buildings without any tangents to the existing community.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included? Not mandated, but a good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? Meeting the texture of existing buildings such that new development blends with existing should hold priority.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Yes - good idea
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included? Moving cars out of the front of a house is consistent with historical views
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? Depending on layout, windows should meet design needs
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures? Shed roofs are correct the char
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? Gable ends should be encouraged but not required

Name not shown inside City Limits January 12, 2023, 6:06 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future., Other - I live only a couple blocks from the core on Summit Ave.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? When neighborhoods have identity and connectivity, residents are more likely to take better care of them.
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? I'm not sure: exempt from which standards? No exemptions for replacement buildings; only for repairs and single-family same-owner expansions.
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included? What about solar panel enabling standards. I think this is a good idea but should include those as well.
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? Some materials are not energy conserving for either summer or winter. I would not consider some of the materials neighborhood styles either but merely cheap building methods.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Yes - good idea
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? A cover should not add only visual appeal but utility: a place to stand briefly out of the weather; a dry spot for mail deliveries or wet shoes.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Yes - good idea
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures? On ALL 3 options, precedence for solar panel positioning and snow-shedding safety. Flagstaff will *never* be PHX!
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? Unsure but standards for solar cell facilitating orientations must be included.
What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja? Prohibit New Parking in the Front of Homes, Building Face (Facade) Variation (Articulation), Building Face (Facade) Window Consistency
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association? Exempt existing buildings. Make neighborhood especially friendly to keep current occupants in affordable dwellings. Pay attention to future solar panel positionings--- this is an important part of Flagstaff's future. ***Look at a pedestrian overpass from Old Town springs and park. Residents will always cross the tracks and this needs to be safe for them! Connect PV and OT neighborhoods.

Name not available outside City Limits January 12, 2023, 5:20 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): Other - Would love to live there but probably priced out as a local worker
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? A cohesive design approach would help maintain historic character and avoid the genericizing of big money development happening all over Flag
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? Older homes could be grandfathered into/exempted from new design standards. New single family developments (if any) should adopt the new standards
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included? But do not use articulation as an easy bypass over smart, condense footprinting
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included? Would not add articulation for its own sake but try to look at early Craftsman or Basque/Spanish standards, to reference historic Flagstaff sensibilities
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? The variety directly reflects Flagstaff's material history
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included? Have experienced difficulty in getting plans approved by the city for the smallest detail that has no overall impact on building efficiency or visual character. Windows would fall into this category. In favor of the most flexible regulation centered purely on energy efficiency, if any
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? Too restrictive to demand a porch for all structures. The city would need regulate the details of porch characteristics.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? Yes - good idea
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included? Create a less vehicle-centric space
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? Too much regulation for interesting or useful design
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures? Allow the diversity in--this sensibility is in keeping with Vieja's overall varied constructions
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? No - bad idea
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? Don't be too restrictive with design. Instead, make sure drainage plans are good
In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element) Window consistency - too much regulation or restriction hinders unique or useful design, Window trim or recess - too much regulation or restriction hinders unique or useful design, covered entry or porch - too much regulation or restriction hinders unique or useful design, Roof orientation - too much regulation or restriction hinders unique or useful design
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association? Too much design regulation can kill innovative design and unique character. La Plaza Vieja stands out precisely because of its heterogenous character, as earlier designers and builders used the varied techniques and materials within their grasp. This makes the history of the neighborhood come alive, much unlike other parts of Flagstaff that are being re-developed and look all the same. Try to focus regulations on sustainability and energy efficiency. If there are to be any restrictive regulations, refer back to historic styles used in early Flag (like Craftsman, Spanish, Basque, and native styles). For example, native masonry and Basque-style communal courtyards. Incentives could motivate; the city could give "discounts" or allowances on other aspects of development plans if designers choose historic styles over the more commonplace modern ones.

Brittain Davis inside City Limits January 12, 2023, 4:53 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? If this is the residents' desire, I think that should be respected.
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think facade articulation should or should not be included? I like it, but I wouldn't want it if it raised the cost of development too much and prevented good development from happening.
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Neutral/Unsure
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Why do you think roof modulation should or should not be included? I like the aesthetics, but would want the overlay to be balanced with construction cost concerns.
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? I like it because building material choice can help make construction more affordable.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window trim or window recessing should or should not be included? Let property owners decide the look they like for their windows.
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? Neutral/Unsure
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? As long as a minimal entry roof is required, it probably wouldn't be cost-prohibitive.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? No - bad idea
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included? When each lot is considered separately, some sites might really benefit from front parking. Leave it up to the property owner.
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? Let property owners decide the windows that work for their needs.
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures? Shed roofs are attractive and should be allowed if the property owner desires one.
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on homes? Shed roofs are attractive and should be allowed if the property owner desires one.
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? Yes - good idea
Why do you think any shed roof standards should or should include a requirement for contrasting roof planes? Shed roofs are attractive and should be allowed if the property owner desires one.
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? No - bad idea
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? Roof orientation should be determined by the design needs of the home and homeowners.
What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja? Building Face (Facade) Variation (Articulation)
In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element) Roof orientation, Building Face Window Consistency, Window Trim and Recess, Upper Floor Definition, Prohibit New Parking in the Front of Homes
Are there any other thoughts or opinions you would like to share with the project team and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association? Any of my opinions should be considered in light of the fact that I do not live in the neighborhood. I advocate for an overlay that does not put an onerous financial burden on homeowners and prospective homeowners.

Name not available inside City Limits January 12, 2023, 3:34 PM

Considering the project area in the map above, do you (select all that apply): I do not live in or own property in the Neighborhood Core and I do not expect to in the future., Other - I live just north of the neighborhood core.
In theory, do you agree that the City of Flagstaff should craft and adopt some basic design standards to reinforce La Plaza Vieja's character? Agree - good idea
Why do you agree or disagree with this approach? Too much of Flagstaff character has been lost by loopholes in design standards or lack of a plan. These neighborhoods near downtown should b protected.
Do you think one-story homes (both existing and new) should be exempt from any adopted design standards? No - bad idea
Why do you think exempting one-story homes is a good or bad idea? There are some moster one story homes. Some sort of assistsance to single families who find it financially difficult would be in order, though.
Do you think the character overlay should include building face variation (façade articulation) standards? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include upper-floor articulation standards? Yes - good idea
Why do you think upper-floor articulation should or should not be included? This in conjuction with facade articulation would imrpove the look of big buildings
Do you think the character overlay should contain requirements for a change in roof profile (roof modulation standards)? Yes - good idea
Do you think it's a good idea to NOT regulate building materials in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think building materials should or should not be regulated? I think regulation can include a wide variety of materials, but will still protect the neighborhood from future inappropriate materials.
Do you think standards for window trim or recess should be included in the character overlay? Yes - good idea
Do you think the character overlay should include a covered entry roof or porch requirement? No - bad idea
Why do you think requirements for a covered entry or porch should or should not be included? If the other requirements discussed so far are included, then a covered entryway would not be necessary.
Do you think the character overlay should restrict the location of off-street parking to areas located off of alleys or to the side of homes? No - bad idea
Why do you think parking location restrictions should or should not be included? So long as such parking is only for one or two cars, front space would be OK. People will park along the sidewalk anyway. But let's limit the size of said parking.
Do you think requirements for window consistency should be included in the character overlay? No - bad idea
Why do you think window consistency should or should not be included? In the same way that the neighborhood was built of many different materials, it is also built of many different aesthetics. Regulating window placement like this will make the neighborhood look like Stepford. Allow creativity.
Do you think the character overlay should allow shed roofs on garages, detached accessory dwelling units (ADUs), storage sheds and similar structures? NOTE: ADUs are limited to 800 square feet by the current city code and are also allowed over garages. Yes - good idea
Why do you think shed roofs should or should not be allowed on accessory structures? keeping character doesn't mean rejecting progress. Shed roofs an improve efficiency and therefore be better for the environment.
Do you think the character overlay should allow a single-family home or duplex with only a single shed roof with no other roof plane adding variety to the home? Yes - good idea
Do you think that any allowance for shed roof single family homes and duplexes should include a requirement that the roofline integrate two contrasting roof planes? No - bad idea
Do you think the character overlay should include standards for roof orientation? No - bad idea
Why do you think roof orientation requirements should or should not be included? Again, we don't want to turn the neighborhood into a cookie-cutter development. Allowing variety is essential.
What elements of design are most important for a new character overlay to regulate in order to preserve the neighborhood character of la Plaza Vieja? Building Face (Facade) Variation (Articulation), Change In Roof Profile (Modulation), Upper Floor Definition (Articulation)
In your opinion, are there any of the elements from the previous question that the city should NOT regulate and why? (Use one blank for each element) If you regulate everything, it all comes out looking the same. That defeats the purpose.